Archive for September 5, 2010

Blank Transactions

September 5, 2010 Leave a comment

Busy time with a new addition to the household – sleep is clearly an optional parameter these days, but on to one of those oddities you might see in the transaction log. On many occasions you will see transactions in the log that have no operations, the individual transaction entry just has a LOP_BEGIN_XACT following be a LOP_COMMIT_XACT, with no operations being recorded.

So what causes these?
The immediate thought is a straight:

Begin Transaction
Commit Transaction

If you try that and inspect the log, you will notice that it has not added in this mysterious, zero-operation transaction. So that is not the cause.

How about a rolled back transaction? well you should already know that this would not be the answer since the log reserves space ahead during a transaction to record undo operations, due to a rollback. To show that in more detail, given the following simple snippet of SQL:

begin transaction
insert into test (name) values ('a')
rollback transaction

The log then shows the transaction beginning, performing the insert, and then rolling it back by deleting the record and recording it as an aborted transaction.


So neither of the first obvious choices are the cause, the reason seems a bit bizarre, but centres around whether any change was attempted but ignored due to being unecessary. Setting up a test table and inserting that single row into it with a value of ‘a’, run the following statement:

begin transaction
update test set name = 'a'
rollback transaction

Now when you inspect the log, there is a blank transaction, it recorded the start and end of the transaction, but no operations are shown. The same is true if the transaction is rolled back.

If the code is altered slightly to deliberately mean that no modification would occur though, the same does not hold true:

begin transaction
update test set name = 'a' where 1 = 0
commit transaction

Clearly the code is designed to make no modifications, so it is not surprising that no entry occurs in the transaction log, to make the test a bit fairer, let’s design the code in a way that it might make a modification, but it doesn’t.

begin transaction
update test set name = 'a' where name = 'b'
commit transaction

Still no entry in the transaction log.

So the distinction in the logging of these zero-op transactions is whether or not there was matching data to be altered, if a record was found but that the alteration was unnecessary we get a zero-op transaction appear in the log. It does make you wonder, why?

It also means that from an auditing perspective, the attempt to modify the data was not logged, not because it was unsuccessful, but because it was being altered to the values it already had.